Part of the pleasure of going to races is maintaining contact with contemporary friends and club mates. But invariably a race will throw up the chance to chew over past running times with old running friends or acquaintances.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/862e6/862e65e908cac113e20f97728437747897688f98" alt=""
Mike's run was described as "astonishing" by reporter Mel Watman. Certainly equivalent to a sub 28 mins. 10K at least. Mike was telling me he is still in the sport with Bolton United harriers, " putting a bit back" as he put it.
I also caught up with another former local athlete I used to race against; now coach to one of the UK's leading marathon runners. In the conversation I asked him what was the length of his athlete's longest run. He replied that it wasn't done on distance, rather on time. Time seemingly equivalent to his target race time and the run was generally done off road. I could only conclude from this that the actually length then would be a good distance short of 26.2 miles.
It left me thinking again whether this decision, that it is not necessary to train 26.2 and over, is a major factor determining the much talked about performances of today's leading UK marathon men. Perhaps more over distance training runs might just be the missing ingredient?
Going further back to the big London/Boston marathon weekend one performance which stood out for me was that of RYAN HALL in Boston. 2:04:58. for a new U.S. record and 4th place. Now he's certainly one who believes in training over the 26.2 distance. More to follow tomorrow on this...
It's 5 days since that Salford 10K but I think it was still in the old legs today as I returned a very sunny but wind swept Nelson track for this week's "speed session"......8 x 600. It's 9 weeks since I did this session last and I must admit I was hoping for signiicant progress. Last time the average was 2:41.8 , today 2:39.2. So some progress but not at much as expected. Racing takes a toll at any age but more significant at 62.
No comments:
Post a Comment